NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
Regina v Salim SABOUNE [2005] NSWCCA 92 CITATION: This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 10/03/05
JUDGMENT DATE: 10 March 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Wood CJ at CL at 17; Hislop J at 1; Johnson J at 18
DECISION: 1. Leave to appeal granted; 2. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal law - Sentencing - No issue of principle
Crimes Act 1900 - s 112(1) LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 - s 11
R v Thomson (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 CASES CITED: R v T (1990) 47 A Crim R 29 R v Tait (1979) 46 FLR 386
Applicant - Salim Saboune PARTIES: Respondent - Regina
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2001/2733 CCAP
Applicant - in person COUNSEL: Respondent - Mr W Dawe QC
Applicant - in person SOLICITORS: Respondent - S Kavanagh (Director of Public Prosecutions)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 03/21/0456
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Tupman DCJ
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2004/2733
WOOD CJ at CL HISLOP J JOHNSON J
10 March 2005 Regina v Salim SABOUNE Judgment 1 HISLOP J: On 20 November 2003 the applicant pleaded guilty to three charges of break and enter contrary to the Crimes Act 1900 s 112(1). The offences occurred on 24 May 2001, 28 February 2002 and 6 April 2002 respectively. The maximum penalty for each offence is fourteen years imprisonment.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate