NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 151 LGERA 46
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: HUNTER DEVELOPMENT BROKERAGE PTY LTD v CESSNOCK CITY COUNCIL [NO. 2] [2006] NSWCA 292 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 22 September 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 1 November 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Santow JA at 1; Bryson JA at 2; Basten JA at 8
DECISION: (1) Leave to appeal granted; (2) Appeal dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS: COSTS – Land and Environment Court Class 1 proceedings – Land and Environment Court Rules Part 16, Rule 4(2) – whether costs should follow the event in proceedings where questions of legal capacity arise – whether the decision of the primary judge inconsistent with an established approach of the Land and Environment Court – whether inconsistency constitutes error of law
Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW), s 114 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), s 95 Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), s 117 LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW), ss 17, 57, 69 Land and Environment Court Rules 1996, Part 16, r 4 Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), s 85A Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 42 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth), s 824
Australian Postal Commission v Dao (No. 2) (1986) 6 NSWLR 497 Broadwater Action Group Inc v Richmond Valley Council (No. 2) (2003) 129 LGERA 409 CSR Ltd v Fairfield City Council (2001) 117 LGERA 77 Gee v Port Stephens Council (2003) 131 LGERA 325 Heidt v Chrysler Australia Ltd (1976) 26 FLR 257 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Hunter Development Brokerage Pty Ltd v Cessnock City Council [2004] NSWLEC 454 Hunter Development Brokerage Pty Ltd v Cessnock City Council [2005] NSWLEC 727 Hunter Development Brokerage Pty Ltd v Cessnock City Council (2005) 63 NSWLR 124 Kinder Investments Pty Ltd v Sydney City Council (2005) 143 LGERA 237 Knight v F P Special Assets Ltd (1992) 174 CLR 178 Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534 CASES CITED: Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606 Maurici v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (2001) 51 NSWLR 673 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 Norbis v Norbis (1986) 161 CLR 513 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 Outdoor Australia Pty Ltd v Auburn Council (1996) 89 LGERA 365 Pancho Properties Pty Ltd v Wingecarribee Shire Council [2004] NSWLEC 620 Parkes v Byron Shire Council [2004] NSWLEC 722 Penfold v Penfold (1980) 144 CLR 311 Raiti v Leichhardt Municipal Council (1991) 72 LGRA 333 Ruddock v Vadarlis [2001] FCA 1865; (2001) 188 ALR 143 Shaynd v Ku-Ring-Gai Council (2005) 138 LGERA 395 Water Conservation and Irrigation Commission (NSW) v Browning (1947) 74 CLR 492 Wong v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate