NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Group 4 Securitas v Naidu [2005] NSWCA 470
HEARING DATE(S): 13 December 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 13 December 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Ipp JA at 22; Basten JA at 1; Brownie AJA at 23
DECISION: Appliction for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS: DAMAGES – application for leave to appeal against an order for interim payment made pursuant to s82(1) of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) – whether claimant had been denied procedural fairness in that it had not had an opportunity to present full submissions as to why an order should not be made under s82 – whether the case falls within any of the three paragraphs of subs 82(3) of the Civil Procedure Act – the term "judgment" in paragraph (b) of subs 82(3) construed – the interaction of s82 of the Civil Procedure Act and s151B(1)(b) of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW), now repealed – whether an order that the appellant is not entitled to recover workers compensation payments out of the money ordered to be paid is contrary to the appellant's statutory entitlement to recovery under s151B(1)(b) – whether the failure to take into account the compensation payment rendered the separate contributions of the two defendants disproportionate, and therefore contrary to the requirements of s82(5) and (6).
Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED: Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW)
Group 4 Securitas Pty Ltd (Claimant) Devandar Naidu (First Opponent) PARTIES: Nationwide News Limited (Second Opponent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40729/05
G. Parker (Claimant) COUNSEL: B. Slowgrove (First Opponent) S. Torrington (Second Opponent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate