NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
Regina v Suey [2005] NSWCCA 22 CITATION: This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 03/02/05
JUDGMENT DATE: 3 February 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Hunt AJA at 45; Grove J at 46; James J at 2
DECISION: The sentences imposed by her Honour Judge Morgan should stand.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - sentencing - matter referred to Court for review of sentences past following inquiry - abduction, aggravated sexual assault and breaking and entering - applicant stopped one of his co-offenders from attacking the complainant with a wheel brace - this matter not known to sentencing judge - whether if sentencing judge had known it would have affected her findings on contrition - whether any basis for parity argument
Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act Criminal Appeal Act
CASES CITED: Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610
PARTIES: Regina v Ronald James SUEY
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 1998/3390
C Davenport - Appellant COUNSEL: J Bennett SC - Crown
Sparo's - Appellant SOLICITORS: SE O'Connor - Crown
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 97/31/0200
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Morgan DCJ
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 1998/3390
HUNT AJA GROVE J JAMES J
THURSDAY 3 FEBRUARY 2005 REGINA v Ronald James SUEY Judgment
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate