NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
Underwood v Caulfield [2005] NSWSC 1164 CITATION : This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S) : 25 July 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 16 November 2005
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Associate Justice McLaughlin at 1
DECISION : 1. I order that the Plaintiff receive a legacy in the sum of $80,000 from the estate of the late Darrell William Lyons ("the Deceased"), such legacy to be borne by the assets of the estate referred to in clause 3(b) in the will of the Deceased, and such legacy not to bear interest if paid on or before 16 December 2005, and if not so paid to bear interest at the rates prescribed for unpaid legacies pursuant to the Wills, Probate and Administration Act 1898. 2. I stand the proceedings over to a date to be fixed by arrangement with my Associate for argument as to costs.
CATCHWORDS : Succession. - Family Provision. - Claim by mother. - Whether Plaintiff is an eligible person in relation to Deceased. - Factors warranting the making of the application. - Financial and material circumstances of Plaintiff. - Absence of contact between Plaintiff and Deceased during last six years of Deceased's life. - Relevance of services performed by Plaintiff for Deceased. - Competing claims of beneficiaries. - Needs of Plaintiff. - Whether Plaintiff, who has resided in rented accommodation for past eleven years, is entitled to obtain from the estate a benefit sufficient to purchase a residence.
Family Provision Act 1982 LEGISLATION CITED : Wills, Probate and Administration Act 1898
Re Fulop Deceased (1987) 8 NSWLR 679 CASES CITED : Singer v Berghouse (1994) 181 CLR 201 Vigolo v Bostin (2005) 79 ALJR 731
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate