NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Tolfab v Tie [2005] NSWSC 326
HEARING DATE(S) : 20/05/2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 5 July 2005
Equity Division JURISDICTION :
JUDGMENT OF : Associate Justice Macready at 1
DECISION : Paragraph 57
CATCHWORDS : BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION - Whether the decision of an Adjudicator should be set aside for failure to take into consideration material in the Adjudication Response - failure to give proper and adequate reasons - failure to value the work - resulting in a breach of natural justice, or failure by the Adjudicator to bona fide exercise power. - HELD: Proceedings dismissed - Adjudicator did value the works, give appropriate reasons, did not fail to take into account part of submissions. There was no breach of natural justice. There is no question of there being no bona fide exercise of power.
PARTIES : Tollfab Engineering Pty Ltd v Tie Fabrications Pty Ltd & Anthony Dutton
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50020/2005
S. Jacobs for plaintiff COUNSEL : F. Corsaro SC & M. Southwick for first defendant
Raymond Lee & Co for plaintiff SOLICITORS : Peter White & Associates for first defendant Dutton Lawyers for second defendant
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION :
- 1 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION COMMERCIAL LIST
Associate Justice Macready
Tuesday 5 July 2005
50020/05 Tollfab Engineering Pty Ltd v Tie Fabrications Pty Ltd and Anthony Dutton JUDGMENT 1 His Honour: This is the hearing of proceedings in which the plaintiff seeks to set aside a determination by the second defendant of the amount of a progress claim pursuant to the provisions of the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999. A Judge of the Court has referred the matter to me for hearing.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate