NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Georgeski v Owners Corporation SP49833 [2004] NSWSC 945 HEARING DATE(S) : 07/10/04, 08/10/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 7 October 2004 JURISDICTION: Equity Division JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J DECISION : Tender of correspondence rejected
CATCHWORDS : EVIDENCE - admissibility - correspondence on settlement negotiations - prima facie inadmissible - whether admissible because of need to "control the conduct of a proceeding" or under exception for "deliberate abuse of power" LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995, ss.11,131 Kang v Kwan [2001] NSWSC 698 CASES CITED : Norman v Howarth (2003) 180 FLR 1 Van Der Lee v State of New South Wales [2002] NSWCA 286 Annette Georgeski - Plaintiff Owners Corporation SP 49833 - First Defendant PARTIES : Anne Catherine Hynd - Second Defendant Joan Mary Hutchinson - Third Defendant State of New South Wales - Fourth Defendant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 5018/02 Mr M F Holmes QC/Ms K Richardson - Plaintiff COUNSEL : Mr D A Smallbone - Second and Third Defendants Mr T H Barrett - Fourth Defendant Warren McKeon Dickson - Plaintiffs SOLICITORS : Dobes & Andrews - First Defendant McCabe Partners - Second and Third Defendants I V Knight, Crown Solicitor - Fourth Defendant
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
BARRETT J
THURSDAY, 7 OCTOBER 2004.
5018/02 - ANNETTE GEORGESKI v OWNERS CORPORATION SP9833 AND 3 ORS
JUDGMENT ON TENDER OF DOCUMENTS – SEE PAGE 77 OF TRANSCRIPT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate