NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
Scheps v Cobb; Estate of Dagobert Scheps deceased [2005] NSWSC 455 CITATION : This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S) : 21, 22, 23 March 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 13 May 2005
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Burchett AJ at 1
DECISION : Order to be made in favour of plaintiff pursuant to short minutes upon a date to be fixed.
CATCHWORDS : PROPERTY (RELATIONSHIPS ACT) - whether an adult son, instead of claiming under the Family Provision Act against his father's estate, could allege he cared for his father within a "domestic relationship" as defined in the Property (Relationships) Act - unavailability of such a claim unless commenced in father's lifetime - construction of Property (Relationships) Act - CONTRACT - allegation of contractual right of son against deceased estate arising under agreement to care for father in old age - principle requiring very careful scrutiny of claim against deceased - whether legally binding contract intended between father and son - circumstances where binding promise was found - whether alternative restitutionary claim lay if contract was unenforceable
Conveyancing Act 1919, Pt 4 Div 6 Family Provision Act 1982 LEGISLATION CITED : Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1944, s2 Property (Relationships) Act 1984, s5, s20, s25, s44, s47, s52, Div 2, Pt 3 Restitution Law in Australia (1995) K Mason and J W Carter
Balfour v Balfour [1919] 2 KB 571 Beverley v Watson (1994) BC 9401884 at 12-14 Day v Couch [2000] NSWSC 230 Eyota Pty Ltd v Hanave Pty Ltd (1994) 12 ACSR 785 CASES CITED : Hunt v Barlow [2000] NSWSC 324 Plunkett v Bull (1915) 19 CLR 544 Reid v George (1996) 20 Fam LR 374 Skene v Dale [1990] VR 605
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate