NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2006) Aust Torts Reports 81-826
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES v BURTON [2006] NSWCA 12 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 27 September 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 10 February 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Spigelman CJ at 1; Basten JA at 31; Hunt AJA at 87
DECISION: (1) Appeal allowed in part and orders 1 and 2 made by the District Court on 22 October 2004 be set aside; (2) Remit the matter to the District Court for assessment of the loss of the chance of a better medical outcome ; (3) The Respondent pay the Appellant 25% of its costs of the appeal ; (4) The costs of the trial should abide the outcome of the further trial with respect to the assessment of damages ; (5) The Respondent shall have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 (NSW) in relation to the costs of the appeal
CATCHWORDS: NEGLIGENCE – police officer shot at during siege and developed posttraumatic stress disorder - whether reasonably foreseeable risk of psychiatric harm – whether State breached its duty of care by not providing proper psychiatric and psychological treatment and counselling – whether breach of duty caused loss – whether breach of duty materially contributed to severity and duration of PTSD – whether breach of duty caused loss of a chance to reduce severity and duration of PTSD – contributory negligence
LEGISLATION CITED: Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW), s 5(1)(c)
Athey v Leonati [1996] 3 SCR 458 Bonnington Castings Ltd v Wardlaw [1956] AC 613 Dillingham Constructions Pty Ltd v Steel Mains Pty Ltd (1975) 132 CLR 323 Dorset Yacht Co v Home Office [1970] AC 1004 Gregg v Scott [2005] 2 WLR 268 Hatton v Sutherland [2002] 2 All ER 1 Hole v Hocking [1962] SASR 128 Holtby v Brigham & Cowan (Hull) Ltd [2000] 3 All ER 421 Koehler v Cerebos (Aust) Limited [2005] HCA 15; (2005) 79 ALJR 845 Malec v J C Hutton Pty Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 638 CASES CITED: Middleton v Melbourne Tramway and Omnibus Co Ltd (1913) 16 CLR 572 Naxakis v Western General Hospital (1999) 197 CLR 269 Olympic Holdings Pty Limited v Lochel [2004] WASC 61 Purkess v Crittenden (1965) 114 CLR 164 Rufo v Hosking (2004) 61 NSWLR 678 Savini v Australian Terrazzo & Concrete Co Pty Ltd [1959] VR 811 Sellars v Adelaide Petroleum NL (1994) 179 CLR 332 Seltsam Pty Ltd v Ghaleb [2005] NSWCA 208 Smith v Leech Brain & Co Ltd [1962] 2 WLR 148 Watts v Rake (1960) 108 CLR 158 Wilson v Peisley (1975) 50 ALJR 207
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate