NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
R v Jeremy Paul Price [2005] NSWCCA 285 CITATION: This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 11 August 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 15 August 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Simpson J at 1; Johnson J at 61; Rothman J at 62
DECISION: (i) application for leave to appeal granted; (ii) appeal allowed; (iii) the sentence imposed in the District Court quashed; (iv) in lieu thereof, the applicant sentenced to imprisonment with a non-parole period of nine months, commencing 27 October 2004 and expiring on 26 July 2005, with a balance of term of seven months, to expire on 26 February 2006; (v) direct that the applicant be released on parole forthwith.
CATCHWORDS: application for leave to appeal against sentence - aggravated breaking and entering a dwelling - serious indictable offence of assault occasioning actual bodily harm - circumstance of aggravation knowing that a person was present - plea of guilty - finding of special circumstances - subjective circumstances - the use of actual violence taken into account as an aggravating factor - previous discharge without conviction - prior offence treated as aggravating factor under s21A(2) - use of testimonial evidence - inadequate attention to subjective case - prospects of rehabilitation - whether material misdirection as to availability of means by which sentence might be served - basis for court to form a s6(3) opinion
Crimes Act 1900, s105A, s112( Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, Part 4, Division 1A, s5, s6(3), s10(1)(b), s21A, s44(2), s50, s54A(2), s54B LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment (Standard Minimum Sentencing) Act 2002 Criminal Appeal Act 1912, s6(3)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate