NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Smith v Smith [2004] NSWSC 663 HEARING DATE(S) : 20/07/04, 21/07/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 28 July 2004 JURISDICTION: Equity Division JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J DECISION : Declaration that defendant holds undivided one-half share in property upon trust for plaintiff. Order that defendant transfer interest to plaintiff. Order for possession. Leave to issue writ of possession.
CATCHWORDS : EQUITY - unilateral mistake - whether elements exist - unconscionable dealing - intervention by equity even though affected party may have given consent - party affected by profound deafness and unfamiliarity with business and financial affairs - also heavily reliant on husband nearing death - dependence transferred to daughter who took unconscionable advantage LEGISLATION CITED : Conveyancing Act 1919, s.66G Blomley v Ryan (1956) 99 CLR 362 Bridgewater v Leahy (1998) 194 CLR 457 Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio (1983) 151 CLR 447 Huguenin v Baseley (1807) 14 Ves Jun 273 Leibler v Air New Zealand Ltd (No 2) [1999] 1 VR 1 CASES CITED : Louth v Diprose (1992) 175 CLR 621 Sande v Medsara Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 147 Shehata v Hussein [2004] NSWSC 617 Taylor v Johnson (1983) 151 CLR 422 Turner v Windever [2003] NSWSC 1147 Tutt v Doyle (1997) 42 NSWLR 10 PARTIES : Pauline Therese Smith - Plaintiff Helen Jane Smith (now Vocalan) - Defendant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3428/04 COUNSEL : Ms J A D Needham - Plaintiff Defendant in person SOLICITORS : Eakin McCaffery Cox - Plaintiff Defendant in person
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate