NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : DONG v HUGHES [2005] NSWSC 84
HEARING DATE(S) : 7 May 2003, 30 May 2003, 25 June 2003, 13 October 2003, 11 December 2003
JUDGMENT DATE : 24 February 2005
JUDGMENT OF : Levine J
DECISION : 1 Plaintiff granted leave to prosecute the appeal as set out in the Amended Summons seeking leave to appeal and appeal; 2 Plaintiff's Notice of Motion filed on 20 June 2003 is dismissed; 3 The Amended Summons is dismissed; 4 Plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs of the Amended Summons and of the plaintiff's Notice of Motion.
CATCHWORDS : Appeal from Local Court - no evidence proffered by Commonwealth DPP - application for costs - Justices Act s 41A
Bail Act 1978 Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1976 (Tas) LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 Justices Act 1902
Brown v Bessell (unreported, TAS SC, Zeeman J, 4 May 1994) Coleman & Wholgemuth v Harper (unreported, Full Court TAS SC, 1 June 1993) Fosse v DPP & Anor [1999] NSWSC 367 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 CASES CITED : Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534 Michael v Thompson (1894) 20 VLR 548 R v Williamson [1972] 2 NSWLR 281 Ramirez v Sandor's Trustee (unreported, NSWSC, Young J, 23 April 1997) Spautz v Williams (1983) 2 NSWLR 506
CHUAN QIANG DONG (Plaintiff)
v PARTIES : MARK HUGHES (Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 11809 OF 2002
C Steirn SC / T Hall (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : M Cinque / M Allnutt (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate