NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : IBRAHIM & ORS v PHAM & ORS [2004] NSWSC 650 HEARING DATE(S) : 19/07/04-20/07/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 29 July 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Levine J DECISION : Evidence inadmissible
CATCHWORDS : Tendency evidence - admissibility - civil action LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 ss 97, 135 ASIC v Vines [2003] NSWSC 1237 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v 4WD Systems Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 850 CASES CITED : Jacara Pty Ltd v Perpetual Trustees WA Ltd (2000) 106 FCR 51 Regina v Ellis [2003] NSWCCA 319 Trylow v Commissioner of Taxation [2004] FCA 446 RIMA IBRAHIM (First plaintiff)
SARGON NAJORIAN BADAL (Second plaintiff)
BADAL INVESTMENTS PTY LTD (Third plaintiff)
v
PHILIP PHAM (First defendant) PARTIES : PHAM ATIC PTY LTD (Second defendant)
FRED DAVID (Third defendant)
SUZIE DAVID (Fourth defendant)
PAUL MANUELPILLA DOMINIC (Sixth defendant)
LINDA JOAN GLORIA ROMANO (Seventh defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20483 OF 2002 B H K Donovan QC / D Baran (Plaintiffs)
COUNSEL : D Pritchard (First and second defendants)
R Darke SC / M Dicker (Third to sixth defendants) Barclay Benson Lawyers (Plaintiffs)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate