NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2005) Aust Contract Reports 90-215
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Helmos Enterprises Pty Ltd v Jaylor Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 235
HEARING DATE(S): 13/04/05
JUDGMENT DATE: 8 July 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Hodgson JA at 1; Young CJ in Eq at 21; Stein AJA at 160
DECISION: Orders: (1) Appeal allowed with costs; (2) Orders of Brownie AJ set aside; (3) Cross appeal dismissed with costs; (4) Remit issue of quantum of damages to the Equity Division; (5) Costs of the first trial referred to the Judge or Associate Justice who hears the second trial.
CATCHWORDS: CONTRACT-Commercial contracts- Plaintiff seeking to purchase two restaurants- First purchase completed- Second purchase not completed- Seven aspects of deal unclear- In circumstances contract in fourth class of Masters v Cameron- How court deals with problems of incomplete contract.
Liquor Act 1982 LEGISLATION CITED: Retail Leases Act 1994, ss 39, 41, 41A Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)
Australian Broadcasting Corporation v XIVth Commonwealth Games Ltd (1988) 18 NSWLR 540 Balfour v Balfour [1919] 2 KB 57 Baulkham Hills Private Hospital Pty Ltd v GR Securities Pty Ltd (1986) 40 NSWLR 622 Biotechnology Australia Pty Ltd v Pace (1988) 15 NSWLR 130 British Bank for Foreign Trade Ltd v Novinex Ltd [1949] 1 KB 623 Chillingworth v Esche [1924] 1 Ch 97 City of Box Hill v E W Tauschke Pty Ltd [1974] VR 39 Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v G H Dean & Co Pty Ltd [1983] 2 Qd R 204 Corpers (No 664) Pty Ltd v NZI Securities Australia Ltd [1989] ANZ ConvR 548 Custom Credit Corporation Ltd v Cenepro Pty Ltd (NSWCA, unreported, 7.8.1991) Edwards v Skyways Ltd [1964] 1 WLR 349 Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community of SA Inc (2002) 209 CLR 95 Fitzgerald v F J Leonhardt Pty Ltd (1997) 189 CLR 215 Godecke v Kirwan (1973) 129 CLR 629 GR Securities Pty Ltd v Baulkham Hills Private Hospital Pty Ltd (1986) 40 NSWLR 631 Gregory v Mighell (1811) 18 Ves 328; 34 ER 341 Hall v Busst (1960) 104 CLR 206 CASES CITED: Hillas & Co Ltd v Arcos Ltd (1932) 147 LT 503 Mamidoil-Jetoil Greek Petroleum Co SA v Okta Crude Oil Refinery AD [2001] 2 Lloyd's Rep 76 Masters v Cameron (1954) 91 CLR 353 May & Butcher Ltd v The King (1929) [1934] 2 KB 17n National Engineering Pty Ltd v Chilco Enterprises Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 291 Pagnan SpA v Feed Products Ltd [1987] 2 Lloyd's Rep 601; [1987] 2 Lloyd's Rep 615 (C/A) Perry v Suffields Ltd [1916] 2 Ch 187 Player v Isenberg [2002] NSWCA 186 Sinclair, Scott & Co Ltd v Naughton (1929) 43 CLR 310 Thorby v Goldberg (1964) 112 CLR 597 Toyota Motor Corp Australia Ltd v Ken Morgan Motors Pty Ltd [1994] 2 VR 106 Trawl Industries of Australia Pty Ltd v Effem Foods Pty Ltd (1992) 27 NSWLR 326 Triden Properties Ltd v Capita Financial Group Pty Ltd (C/A, unreported, 26.11.1993) Vitol BV v Compagnie Europeene des Petroles [1988] 1 Lloyd's Rep 574 Von Hatzfeldt-Wildenburg v Alexander [1912] 1 Ch 284 Vroon BV v Foster's Brewing Group Ltd [1994] 2 VR 32 York Air Conditioning & Refrigeration (Australasia) Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (1949) 80 CLR 11
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate