NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Gate Gourmet Australia Pty Limited (in liquidation) v Gate Gourmet Holding AG & Ors [2004] NSWSC 768 HEARING DATE(S) : 18/08/04, 19/08/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 27 August 2004
JURISDICTION: Equity Division Commercial List JUDGMENT OF : Einstein J DECISION : Subject to one clarification, S.50 application to be allowed. Rulings on privilege.
CATCHWORDS : Application to allow summary evidence - Legal Professional Privilege LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Southcorp Limited (2003) 46 ACSR 438 Attorney-General (NT) v Maurice (1986) 161 CLR 475; 69 ALR 31 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Lux Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 89; BC 200300344 Australian Federal Police, Commissioner of v Propend Finance Pty Ltd (1997) 188 CLR 501; 141 ALR 545; 91 A Crim R 451 Dingwall v Commonwealth of Australia (1992) 39 FCR 521 Goldberg v Ng (1995) 185 CLR 83; 132 ALR 57 CASES CITED : Instant Colour Pty Ltd v Canon Australia Pty Ltd [1995] FCA 870; BC9506842 Interchase Corp Ltd (in liq) v Grosvenor Hill (Qld) Pty Ltd (No 1) [1999] 1 Qd R 141 Spassked Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (No 4) (2002) 50 ATR 70 Temwell Pty Ltd v DKGR Holdings Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 948 Tirango Nominees Pty Ltd v Dairy Vale Foods Ltd (No 2) (1998) 83 FCR 397; 156 ALR 364 Trade Practices Commission v Sterling (1979) 36 FLR 244 Wheeler v Le Marchant (1881) 17 Ch D 675 Gate Gourmet Australia Pty Limited (in liquidation) ACN 089 347 562 (Plaintiff) Gate Gourmet Holding AG, Company Number CH-020.3.003.945-1 (First Plaintiff) Gate Gourmet (Holdings) Pty Limited ACN 004 122 872 (Second Defendant) PARTIES : Odd Gunnar Engebretsen (Third Defendant) Lars Fredrik Larsen (Fourth Defendant) Henning Boysen (Fifth Defendant) Lucas Grolimund (Sixth Defendant) Gate Gourmet Switzerland GMBH (Seventh Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50180/01 COUNSEL : Mr B Coles QC, Ms E Collins (Plaintiff) Mr M Pembroke QC, Mr N Perram (Second, Fifth, Sixth and Seventh Defendants) SOLICITORS : Clayton Utz (Plaintiff) Mallesons Stephen Jaques (Second, Fifth, Sixth and Seventh Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate