NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Murakami v Murakami; Murakami Re the Estate of Murakami; Murakami v Wiryadi [2005] NSWSC 953
HEARING DATE(S) : 13 and 14 September 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 26 September 2005
Equity Division JURISDICTION : Probate List
JUDGMENT OF : Windeyer J at 1
DECISION : Special grant of Letters of Administration Ad Litem revoked
CATCHWORDS : PROBATE - letters of administration - application to revoke ex parte grant of letters of administration ad litem - incorrect statements included in affidavit in support of ex parte application - full disclosure not made - whether misstatements material to decision to make the grant.
LEGISLATION CITED : Wills Probate and Administration Act 1898 s40
Garrard t/as Arthur Anderson & Co v Email Furniture Pty Ltd (1993) 32 NSWLR 662 CASES CITED : Thomas A Edison Ltd v Bullock (1912) 15 CLR 679
In 109555 of 2005 Ryuji Murakami (Plaintiff) Takako Murakami (Defendant In 107306 of 2005 Takako Murakami (Plaintiff) Re the Estate of Takashi Murakami Suroso In 2906/05 Takako Murakami (Plaintiff) Louise Maria Wiryadi (First Defendant) PARTIES : Ryuji Murakami (Second Defendant) Ryuzo Murakami (Third Defendant) Sjamsjur Bahari (Fourth Defendant) Janti Lestare Wiryadi (Fifth Defendant) Glenn Martin Wiryadi (Sixth Defendant) Evelyn Dionne Wiryadi (Seventh Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 109555 of 2005; 107306 of 2005; 2906 of 2005
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate