NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
Charles Hermanowski v United States of America & Ors [2005] NSWSC 145 CITATION : This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S) : 28/2/05, 1/3/05
JUDGMENT DATE : 13 April 2005
JUDGMENT OF : Bell J at 1
DECISION : 1. Confirm the orders made by the Magistrate on 7 May 2004; 2. Dismiss the plaintiff's summons.
Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) LEGISLATION CITED : Extradition (United States of America) Regulations
Cabal v United Mexican States [2001] FCA 427; 108 FCR 311 Cabal v United Mexican States No. 3 [2000] FCA 1204; 186 ALR 188 Dutton v O'Shane [2002] NSWSC 1086 George v Rockett (1990) 170 CLR 104 Harris v Attorney-General (Cth) (1994) 52 FCR CASES CITED : Jacobi v United States of America [1996] 962 FCA 1 Pasini v United Mexican States [2002] HCA 3; 209 CLR 246 Pearce v R [1998] HCA 57; 194 CLR 610 Republic of South Africa v Dutton (9197) 77 FCR 128 Todhunter v Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia (1993) 52 FCR 228
Charles Hermanowski (Plaintiff) PARTIES : United States of America (First Defendant) Jillian Orchiston, Magistrate (Second Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 11455/04
N. Hutley SC / D. Jordan (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : M. M. Gordon SC / P. E. McDonald (Defendant)
Kessels Goddard + Ajuria (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Commonwealth DPP (First Defendant)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION :
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate