NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 157 A Crim R 41 64 NSWLR 413
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
Regina v Stone [2005] NSWCCA 344 CITATION: This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 20/9/05
JUDGMENT DATE: 24 October 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Hunt AJA at 1; Hislop J at 73; Smart AJ at 74
DECISION: Crown appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS: Autrefois convict - plea in bar in nature of autrefois convict- not permitted while plea of not guilty remains standing on the record - leave to withdraw plea of not guilty if plea in bar a good one - Autrefois convict - plea in bar in nature of autrefois convict- requirement that both conviction (in the sense of a finding of guilt) and sentence (in the sense of the final disposal of the case) must be established by the accused - Autrefois convict - plea in bar in nature of autrefois convict- judge's ruling that plea in bar had been made out when there had not be a sentence erroneous - ruling a final decision disposing of the proceedings - acquittal - no Crown appeal lies from that ruling whether pursuant to s 5F of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 or otherwise.
Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Criminal Code (Tasmania), Schedule 1 to Criminal Code Act 1924 LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Act 1981 (Victoria)
Burgess v Boetefur (1844) 7 Man & G 481 [135 ER 193] Cobiac v Liddy (1969) 119 CLR 257 Della Patrona v DPP [No 2] (1995) 38 NSWLR 257 DPP v Collins [2004] VSCA 179 Gill v Walton (1991) 25 NSWLR 190 Grassby v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 1 Green v United States 355 US 184 (1957) Griffiths v The Queen (1977) 137 CLR 293 Kopuz v District Court of NSW (1992) 28 NSWLR 232 Maxwell v The Queen (1996) 184 CLR 501 Li Wan Quai v Christie (1906) 3 CLR 1125 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 Regina v Cheng (1999) 48 NSWLR 610 Regina v Dodd (1991) 56 A Crim R 451 Regina v Holton [2004] NSWCCA 214 Regina v King (2003) 139 A Crim R 132 Regina v Lethlean (1995) 83 A Crim R 197 CASES CITED: Regina v Marchione (2002) 128 A Crim R 574 Regina v Tonks [1963] VR 121 Regina v Vincent [2002] NSWCCA 110 Rex v Banks [1911] 2 KB 1095 Rex v Barron [1914] 2 KB 570 Rex v Parry & Ors (1837) 7 C & P 836 [173] ER 364 Rex v Sheraton [1937] 1 KB 223 Richards v The Queen [1993] AC 217 Rogers v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 251 S (an infant) v Recorder of Manchester [1971] AC 481 Saraswati v The Queen (1991) 172 CLR 1 The King v Kent-Newbold (1939) 62 CLR 398 The Queen v Blaby [1894] 2 QB 170 The Queen v Milnes and Green (1983) 33 SASR 211 US v Ball 163 US 662 (1896) Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378 Wemyss v Hopkins (1875) LR 10 QB 378 at 381
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate