NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Aguiar v Registrar to the Workers Compensation Commission of NSW & Ors [2005] NSWSC 1017
HEARING DATE(S) : 7 October 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 14 October 2005
Common Law Division JURISDICTION : Administrative Law List
JUDGMENT OF : Associate Justice Malpass at 1
DECISION : The summons is dismissed; the plaintiff is to pay the costs of the summons.
CATCHWORDS : Power to increase period for an appeal - special circumstances - threshold question of prohibition.
LEGISLATION CITED : Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998, s327(5)
Celina Aguiar (Plaintiff) Registrar to the Workers Compensation Commission of New South Wales (First Defendant) PARTIES : Estee Lauder Pty Limited (Second Defendant) WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Third Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 30068/05
Mr T Wardell (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : Mr J W Dodd (Second Defendant) Mr R Beech-Jones (Third Defendant)
Steve Masselos & Co (Plaintiff) I V Knight Crown Solicitor (First and Third Defendant) SOLICITORS : Hunt & Hunt (Second Defendant)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Workers Compensation Commission of New South Wales
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : WCC14875-2004
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Registrar of the Workers Compensation Commission of New South Wales
- 10 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST
Associate Justice Malpass
14 October 2005
30068 of 2005 Celina Aguiar v Registrar to the Workers Compensation Commission of New South Wales & Ors
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate