NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Riordan v Cross & Ors [2005] NSWSC 112
HEARING DATE(S) : 24 February 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 1 March 2005
Common Law Division JURISDICTION : Administrative Law List
JUDGMENT OF : Master Malpass at 1
DECISION : 1. The summons is dismissed; 2. The plaintiff is to pay the costs of the summons; 3. The exhibits may be returned.
CATCHWORDS : Ex parte proceedings - belated application to add a ground of appeal - jurisdiction - matters of procedure - non-compliance with regulations - residential building work - ambit of appeal.
Consumer Trader & Tenancy Tribunal Act 2001, ss65, 67 LEGISLATION CITED : Consumer Trader & Tenancy Tribunal Regulation 2002 Home Building Act 1989, s3
John Riordan (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Brad Cross & Vicki Cross (First Defendants) Consumer Trader & Tenancy Tribunal (Second Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 30017/04
Mr M W Sneddon (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : Mr T Bland (First Defendants) Submitting appearance (Second Defendant)
McLaughlin & Riordan (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Lindsay Brien (First Defendants) I V Knight Crown Solicitor (Second Defendant)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal of NSW
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : HB 03/09744
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Member A McDonell
- 9 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST
Master Malpass
1 March 2005
30017 of 2004 John Riordan v Brad Cross & Ors
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate