NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Regina v Diab [2005] NSWCCA 64
HEARING DATE(S): 17 February 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 1 March 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Grove J at 1; Bell J at 32; Buddin J at 33
DECISION: Appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE - SENTENCE - MANSLAUGHTER - PRINCIPAL OFFENDER ( A JUVENILE) COMMITS MURDER BY SHOOTING WITH PISTOL - KNOWLEDGE OF PRESENCE OF WEAPON AND INTENTION TO THREATEN VICTIM - CONDUCT OF FIRST INSTANCE PROCEEDINGS - OBVIOUS DECISION NOT TO SUGGEST MITIGATION BY REASON OF PROVOCATION BY VICTIM - DECISION REPUDIATED ON APPEAL - WHETHER MISCARRIAGE - SERIOUS OFFENCES IN WHICH WHAT BECAME THE MURDER WEAPON USED TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT ON FORM 1 - SENTENCE NOT EXCESSIVE
LEGISLATION CITED: S21A(3) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
R v Abou-Chabake [2004] NSWCCA 356 Ratten v The Queen 1974 131 CLR 510 Regina v Elliott, unreported, NSWCCA 14 Feb 1991 CASES CITED: Regina v Goodwin 1990 51 A Crim R 328 Regina v Hill 1981 3 A Crim R 397 Regina v MA [2004] NSWCCA 92
PARTIES: Regina v Kade Diab
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2004/2397
G. Smith SC (Crown) COUNSEL: S. Odgers SC (Applicant)
S. Kavanagh (DPP) SOLICITORS: Galloways (Applicant)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 70118/02
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Shaw J
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2004/2397
GROVE J BELL J BUDDIN J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate