NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Gacic v John Fairfax Publicatons Pty Limited [2005] NSWSC 1210
HEARING DATE(S) : 22/11/2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 6 December 2005
JUDGMENT OF : James J at 1
DECISION : Applications allowed in part
CATCHWORDS : CIVIL LAW – restaurant review – claim in defamation failed – application by defendants to strike out or dismiss claims in – negligence – contract – injurious falsehood – particulars of falsity – particulars of malice
Defamation Act Supreme Court Rules LEGISLATION CITED : Trade Practices Act Uniform Civil Procedure Rules
Bass v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd (2002) 60 NSWLR 251 Bell-Booth Group Limited v Attorney-General [1989] 3 NZLR 148 El-Azzi v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 1057 Griffith & Ors v Australian Broadcasting Corporation & Anor [2004] NSWSC 582 Harvey v John Fairfax Publications [2005] NSWCA 255 Palmer Bruyn & Parker Pty Limited v Parsons (2001) 208 CLR 388 CASES CITED : Ratcliffe v Evans [1892] 2 QB 524 Roberts v Bass (2002) 212 CLR 1 Sattin v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (1996) 39 NSWLR 32 South Pacific Manufacturing Co Limited v New Zealand Security Consultants & Investigations Limited [1992] 2 NZLR 282 Spring v Guardian Assurance Plc [1994] 3 WLR 354 Sullivan v Moody (2001) 207 CLR 562 Tame v New South Wales (2002) 211 CLR 317
PARTIES : Aleksandra GACIC & Ors v John Fairfax Publications Pty Limited & Anor
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20233/04
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate