NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Young v Coupe [2004] NSWSC 999 HEARING DATE(S) : 09/06/04, 10/06/04, 11/06/04, 15/06/04, 16/06/04, 17/06/04, 18/06/04, 28/06/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 29 October 2004
JUDGMENT OF : White J DECISION : 1. Refuse leave to amend the Second Further Amended Statement of Claim; 2. Dismiss the balance of the plaintiffs' claims for relief against the defendants; 3. On the third defendant's first cross-claim: (i.) declare that the contract dated 19 June 2001 between the cross-claimant and the cross-defendants for the purchase of the property known as 21-69 Regent Street Redfern was terminated by the cross-claimant on 8 October 2001 and the cross-claimant was discharged from further performance thereof; (ii.) declare that the cross-claimant is entitled to retain the deposit of $385,000; (iii.) direct that judgment be entered for the cross-claimant against the cross-defendants in the sum of $385,000 together with interest at the rates prescribed from time to time pursuant to s 94 of the Supreme Court Act 1970 from 5 October 2001 to the date of this judgment. 4. Order that the plaintiffs pay the defendants' costs of the proceedings including the cross-claimant's costs of the first cross-claim; 5. The exhibits may be returned after 28 days.
CATCHWORDS : Vendor and Purchaser - Existence of a contract - Whether a valid exchange occurred - Authority of agent to change contract so as to have identical counterparts - Intention of parties - Post-contractual conduct indicating existence of contract. - +Misleading and deceptive conduct - Whether purchaser entitled to rescind for misrepresentation - Whether representations made - Whether reliance upon alleged misrepresentation - Claim for repayment of deposit - Vendors claim for liquidated damages.Agent and Principal - Whether agent made false and misleading representations to induce principal to enter into contract - Whether agent owed duty to assess reasonableness of price paid - Whether agent negligent.No question of principle. Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) LEGISLATION CITED : Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Sindel v Georgiou (1984) 154 CLR 661 Howard Smith & Co Ltd v Varawa (1907) 5 CLR 68 Barrier Wharfs v W Scott Fell & Co Ltd (1908) 5 CLR 647 CASES CITED : B Seppelt & Sons Ltd v Commissioner for Main Roads (1975) 1 BPR 9147 Film Bars Pty Ltd v Pacific Film Laboratories Pty Ltd (1979) 1 BPR 9251 Brambles Holdings Ltd v Bathurst City Council (2001) 53 NSWLR 153 Gould v Vaggelas (1985) 157 CLR 215 Kevin Young & Anor PARTIES : v Paul Coupe & 4 Ors FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2947/02 Plaintiffs: Mr I M Khan, Mr P Menadue COUNSEL : 1st & 2nd Defendants: Mr G Ellis 3rd to 5th Defendants: Mr S Epstein SC, Mr C Dimitriadis Plaintiff: David Geddes Solicitor SOLICITORS : 1st & 2nd Defendants: Colin Biggers & Paisley 3rd to 5th Defendants: Baron & Associates Solicitors
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate