NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Bidald Consulting v Miles Special Builders; Bidald Consulting v Miles Special Builders [2005] NSWSC 1235
HEARING DATE(S) : 23/9/05, 26/9/05 & 2/11/05
JUDGMENT DATE : 9 December 2005
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Campbell J
DECISION : Deed terminated. Company wound up.
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS – voluntary administration – Deed of Company Arrangement – termination of – construction of section 445D(1) Corporations Act 2001 – circumstances of application of section 445D(1)(a) and (b) – interrelationship of section 445D(1)(a) and (b) – meaning of "false or misleading" – meaning of "material" – role of informal seeking of views of creditors in deciding materiality – whether failure to call meeting of creditors in circumstances when Deed required it to be called is a material contravention of the Deed – whether winding up proceedings being on foot prevents Deed Administrator from calling meeting of creditors to consider placing company into liquidation – whether a Deed can provide for the de facto winding up of the company – in what circumstances payment of different amounts to creditors bound by a Deed is permissible – role of good faith between creditors in operation of Deed - section 445D(1)(e) does not apply to action contrary to the Deed – relevance of a Deed allowing an insolvent company to continue to trade – relevance of substantial departure in practice from proposal put to creditors at time Deed was adopted – operation of discretion to set aside Deed – relevance of interests of creditors – relevance of public interest – public interest factors which can be taken into account – significance of provision of false or misleading information – whether termination to be affected on application by person said to be a disputed creditor – procedure to achieve winding up by the Court when Deed terminated – BANKRUPTCY – arrangements with creditors without sequestration – composition under the general law – whether, and in what circumstances, special benefits can be provided to one creditor bound by a composition – juristic basis of prohibition on one creditor bound by a composition receiving a special benefit – role of consideration in compositions – CONTRACTS – GENERAL CONTRACTUAL PRINCIPLES – consideration – role of consideration in composition between debtor and creditors – juristic basis on which Court prevents one creditor bound by a composition from receiving a special benefit – PROCEDURE – contempt, attachment and sequestration – action out of Court frustrating litigation in Court – when a contempt
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate