NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Project 28 Pty Ltd (Formerly Narui Gold Coast Pty Ltd) v Barr; Project 28 Pty Ltd (Formerly Narui Gold Coast Pty Ltd) v Tim Barr Pty Ltd & Ors [No 2] [2005] NSWCA 420
HEARING DATE(S): On written submissions
JUDGMENT DATE: 2 December 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Hodgson JA at 1; Ipp JA at 2; Campbell AJA at 19
DECISION: The application by Project 28 Pty Ltd and the application by Tim Barr Pty Ltd and Mr Barr are both dismissed with costs.
LEGISLATION CITED: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), Pt 36 r 36.11(2)
CA 41018/04 Project 28 Pty Ltd (Formerly Narui Gold Coast Pty Ltd) (Claimant) Timothy James Barr (Opponent) CA 41019/04 PARTIES: Project 28 Pty Ltd (Formerly Narui Gold Coast Pty Ltd) (Claimant) Tim Barr Pty Ltd (First Opponent) Timothy James Barr (Second Opponent) Shigeo Narui (Third Opponent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 41018/04; 41019/04
CA 41018/04 & CA 41019/04 M Einfeld QC/R E Dubler SC/A Harding (Claimants) COUNSEL: R G McHugh/J E Lazarus (First & Second Opponents) CA 41019/04 No Appearance (Third Opponent)
CA 41018/04 & CA 41019/04 Verekers (Claimants) SOLICITORS: Corrs Chambers Westgarth (First & Second Opponents) CA 41019/04 No Appearance (Third Opponent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court - Equity Division
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): ED 4564/02; ED 2762/02
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Palmer J
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 41018/04 CA 41019/04 ED 4564/02 ED 2762/02
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate