NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Regina v Webster [2005] NSWCCA 110
HEARING DATE(S): 31/03/2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 31 March 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Giles JA at 1; Hoeben J at 2; Johnson J at 45
DECISION: Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: S112(1) Crimes Act 1900 - multiple offences - appropriate starting point for head sentence - relevance of maximum sentence - delay in sentencing - proper use of offences on Form 1.
Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
Attorney General's application under s37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002, 56 NSWLR 146 at para 42 R v Kay [2004] NSWCCA 130 Osenkowski v The Queen (1982) 30 SASR 212 CASES CITED: R v Pearce (1998) 194 CLR 610 Ponfield" (1999) 48 NSWLR 327 R v Richards (1981) 2 NSWLR 464 R v Wheeler [2000] NSWCCA 34
Andrew John Webster - Applicant PARTIES: Crown - Respondent
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2004/3286
R Hulme SC - Applicant COUNSEL: A Woodburne - Respondent
SE O'Connor - Legal Aid Commission of NSW SOLICITORS: S Kavanagh - Solicitor for Public Prosecutions
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 04/11/0306
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Latham DCJ
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2004/3286
GILES JA HOEBEN J JOHNSON J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate