NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Regina v Pearson [2005] NSWCCA 116
HEARING DATE(S): 24/03/05
JUDGMENT DATE: 20 April 2005
JUDGMENT OF: James J at 1; Hislop J at 85; Hall J at 86
DECISION: Leave to appeal against sentences granted. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - aggravated indecent assault - using a child under fourteen years for pornographic purposes - principal in second degree to another doing something intending to hinder the investigation of a serious indictable offence - whether the sentencing judge took into account as an aggravating feature of the offence the complainant's vulnerability having regard to the complainant's age, when age was an element of the offence - whether insufficient weight given to pleas of guilty - whether mistake of fact in relation to criminal antecedents - whether findings of fact unsupported by any evidence - whether sentence was manifestly excessive
Crimes Act LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act Criminal Appeal Act
House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 The Queen v De Simoni (1981) 147 CLR 383 R v Astill (No. 2) (1992) 64 A Crim R 289 R v Castles [2005] NSWCCA 79 R v Cocking [1999] NSWCCA 311 R v Cramp [2004] NSWCCA 264 R v Hanslow [2004] NSWCCA 163 CASES CITED: R v Ingrassia (1996) 41 NSWLR 447 R v Johnstone [2004] NSWCCA 307 R v Khouzame [2000] NSWCCA 505 R v Mohamadin [2004] NSWCCA 401 R v Scott [ 2003] NSWCCA 286 R v Thomson; R v Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Way (2004) 60 NSWLR 168 R v Wickham [2004] NSWCCA 193
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate