NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2006) NSW ConvR 56-145
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Ruthol Pty Ltd v Tricon (Australia) Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 443
HEARING DATE(S): 3 November 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 21 December 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Giles JA at 1; Santow JA at 70; Hunt AJA at 71
DECISION: Appeal dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS: Damages - breach of contract - delay in completion of sale of land - purchaser was lessee from vendor - vendor sued for rent for period of delay - whether claim failed because was taking advantage of own wrong - was entitled to rent - purchaser entitled to damages in the same amount - whether in assessing damages allowance for benefit to purchaser of not having to pay purchase price for period of delay - what was benefit - needed proof of actual benefit - and no allowance because in the circumstances any benefit not caused by breach of contract. D
Alghussein Establishment v Eton College (1988) 1 WLR 587; Allen v Bega Valley Council (1994) 85 LGERA 364; Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v GSF Australia Pty Ltd (2001) 215 ALR 385; Bendall v Haines (1991) 172 CLR 60; British Westinghouse Manufacturing Co Ltd v Underground Electrical Railways Co of London Ltd (1912) AC 673; Chappell v Hart (1998) 195 CLR 232; Cheall v Association of Professional Executive Clerical and Computer Staff (1983) 2 AC 180; re C L Nye Ltd (1971) Ch 442; Cordiant Communications (Australia) Pty Ltd v The Communications Group Holdings Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 1005; Environment Agency (formerly National Rivers Authority) v Empress Car Co (Abertillery) Ltd (1999) 2 AC 22; Erie County Natural Gas & Fuel Co Ltd v Caroll (1911) AC 105; Gates v The City Mutual Life Assurance Society Pty Ltd (1986) 160 CLR 1; Grozier v Tate (1946) 16 LGR 57; Harbutt's "Plasticine" Ltd v Wayne Tank & Pump Co Ltd (1970) 1 QB 447; Hi-Fert Pty Ltd v Kiukiang Maritime Carriers Inc (2000) 173 ALR 263; Hoad v Scone Motors Pty Ltd (1977) 1 NSWLR 88; Hobartville Stud Pty Ltd v Union Insurance Co Ltd (1991) 25 NSWLR 358; Hooper v Lane (1859) 6 HL Cas 443; 10 ER 1368; Hussain v New Taplow Paper Mills Ltd (1988) 1 AC 514; CASES CITED: Hungerfords v Walker (1988) 171 CLR 125; Hyder Consulting (Australia) Pty Ltd v Whlh Wilhelmsen Agency Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 313; Koch Marine Inc v D'Amica Societa di Navigazione ARL ("The Elena d'Amico") (1980) 1 Ll LR 75; Lavarack v Woods of Colchester Ltd (1967) 1 QB 278; Levison v Farin (1978) 2 All ER 1149; re London Celluloid Company (1988) 39 Ch D 190; Mills v Ruthol Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 294; Mitchell v Pattern Holdings Pty Ltd [2002] NSWCA 212; Monroe Schneider Associates (Inc) v No 1 Raberem Pty Ltd (1991) 35 FLR 1; New Zealand Shipping Co Ltd v Societe des Ateliers et Chantiers de France (1919) AC 1 (HL); (1917) 2 KB 717 (CA); Richco International Ltd v Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH (1991) 1 Ll R 136; Ruthol Pty Ltd v Mills [2003] NSWCA 56; Screenco Pty Ltd v R L Drew Pty Ltd (2003) 58 NSWLR 720; Simonius Vischer & Co v Holt & Thompson (1979) 2 NSWLR 322; Steedman v The Council of the Shire of Baulkham Hills (No 2) (1993) 80 LGERA 323; Sutor v Gundowda Pty Ltd (1950) 81 CLR 418; TCN Channel 9 Pty Ltd v Hayden Engerprises Pty Ltd (1989) 16 NSWLR 130; The World Beauty (1970) P 144; Travel Compensation Fund v Robert Tambree [2005] HCA 69; Tyco Australia Pty Ltd v Optus Network Pty Ltd [2004] NSWCA 433;
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate