NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Robertson v The Zinc Corporation Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 372
HEARING DATE(S): 28 July 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 31 October 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Santow JA at 1; Mathews AJA at 62
DECISION: Leave to appeal denied. Claimant to pay opponent's costs.
CATCHWORDS: PROCEDURE - leave to appeal against denial of extension of limitation period to bring an action for noise-induced hearing loss claimant contends he suffered in the course of his employment between 1954 to 1978 - whether the absence of a particular witness was significantly prejudicial to the opponent - whether the primary judge failed to have regard to other available evidence.
LEGISLATION CITED: Limitation Act 1969 of NSW s60G(2)
BHP Steel (AIS) Pty Ltd v Dimitrioski, NSWCA, 7 March 1997 Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylor (1996) 186 CLR 541 Cowie v State Electricity Commission of Victoria [1964] VR 788 Holt v Wynter (2000) 49 NSWLR 128 Jones v Royal Hospital for Women [1998] NSWCA 384 CASES CITED: McLean v Sydney Water Corp [2001] NSWCA 122 Parsons v Doukas (2001) 52 NSWLR 162 Salido v Nominal Defendant (1993) 32 NSWLR 524 South Western Sydney Area Health Service v Gabriel [2001] NSWCA 477 Sydney City Council v Zegarac (1998) 43 NSWLR 195
Robert James ROBERTSON (Claimant) PARTIES: THE ZINC CORPORATION PTY LTD (Opponent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 41021/03
K W ANDREWS (Claimant) COUNSEL: G R GRAHAM (Opponent)
Sowden Akerman (Claimant) SOLICITORS: Cutler Hughes & Harris (Opponent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate