NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Admiral I Pty Ltd v Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 1105
HEARING DATE(S) : 27/10/05
JUDGMENT DATE : 3 November 2005
Equity Division JURISDICTION : Technology and Construction List
JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J
DECISION : Order for trial of claims in summons separately from cross-claim. Defendant's application for stay dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE - whether claims in summons should be tried separately from cross-claim - each involving same contract but separate allegations of modification by conduct at times two years apart - some commonality of witnesses whose credit might be attacked - further party added by cross-claim - cross-claim suitable for referal to referee - whether analogy with separate trial of liability and damages - PROCEDURE - application for stay where dispute resolution clause not observed - whether clause applicable - whether exception for "injunctive relief" activated - whether, in the circumstances, court would exercise discretion in support of the clause
ABB Engineering Construction Pty Ltd v Rail Freight Corporation [1999] NSWSC 1037 Australian National Industries Ltd v Spedley Securities Pty Ltd (1992) 26 NSWLR 411 Huddart Parker Ltd v The Ship Mill Hill (1950) 81 CLR 502 CASES CITED : Livesey v New South Wales Bar Association (1983) 151 CLR 288 Pioneer Park Pty Ltd v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2005] NSWSC 832 Tepko Pty Ltd v Water Board (2001) 206 CLR 1
Admiral I Pty Limited - First Plaintiff Admiral II Pty Limited - Second Plaintiff PARTIES : Admiral III Pty Limited - Third Plaintiff Leighton Contractors Pty Limited - Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate