NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Sirtes v Pryer [2005] NSWSC 1082
HEARING DATE(S) : 26, 27, 29, 30 September 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 25 October 2005
JURISDICTION : Supreme Court Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Burchett AJ at 1
DECISION : See para 26
CATCHWORDS : Equity upon loss of substratum of arrangement under principle of Muschinski v Dodds - quantum of equitable charge - whether based on amount of expenditure upon improvement of property of chargee or upon amount of the increase in value of the property - whether there is a general principle applicable to both promissory estoppel cases and Muschinski v Dodds cases - effect of failure of marriage upon transfer of interest in her home by a mother-in-law to her daughter-in-law - order for transfer back to mother-in-law subject to equitable charge in favour of her son and daughter-in-law measured by the increase in the value of the property by virtue of building works carried out by the son and daughter-in-law.
LEGISLATION CITED : Property (Relationships) Act 1984 (NSW)
Baumgartner v Baumgartner (1987) 164 CLR 137 at 148 Burgess v King [2005] NSWSC 231 at [16] Crabb v Arun District Council {1976} Ch 179 at 198 Forgeard v Shanahan (1994) 35 NSWLR 206 at 223 Giumelli v Giumelli (1999) 196 CLR 101 at 122-125 Henderson v Miles (No 2) [2005] NSWSC 867 Hogan v Baseden (1997) 8 BPR 15,723 at 15,726 CASES CITED : Houghton v Immer (No 155) Pty Ltd (1997) 44 NSWLR 46 at 56 Knox v Knox (Young J, unrep 16/12/1994) Muschinski v Dodds (1985) 160 CLR 583 at 620 Nichols v Nichols (1986) 4 BPR 9240 at 9244 Pascoe v Turner [1979] 1 WLR at 438 The Commonwealth v Verwayen (1990) 170 CLR 394 Waltons Stores (Interstate) Limited v Maher (1988) 164 CLR 387 at 404
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate