NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Chapman v. Taylor & Ors; Vero Insurance Ltd. v. Taylor & Ors (No.3) [2005] NSWCA 95
HEARING DATE(S): Matter dealt with on written submissions in Chambers
JUDGMENT DATE: 1 April 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Beazley JA at 1; Hodgson JA at 2; Tobias JA at 15
DECISION: 1. Vacate Order 4 made on 9 February 2005, and in lieu thereof order that Mr. and Mrs. Taylor pay Vero's costs before the Master and of the appeal (including the application for leave), assessed in each case on the basis of the briefing of one Counsel at fees appropriate to Junior Counsel, and that they have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act if otherwise eligible. 2. Vero's costs of the appeal not to include costs incurred after delivery of judgment on 9 February 2005, and no order as to these costs.
CATCHWORDS: COSTS - Appeal - Proportionality of costs - Two parties with substantially similar interests - Separate appeals brought - One appellant, an insurer with an interest in establishing a general point, briefed senior counsel - Respondent ordered to pay the appellant's costs, not extending to briefing senior counsel.
David Neil Chapman - appellant Ernest & Fredericka Taylor - 1st respondents PARTIES: Vero Insurance Ltd - 2nd respondent Consumer, Trader & Tenancy Tribunal - 3rd respondent
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40120/04; 41106/03
COUNSEL: The relevant parties filed written submissions
G.P. Bartels, Eastwood for 1st respondent SOLICITORS: McLachlan Chilton, Sydney for 2nd respondent
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court - Common Law Division
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): SC12971/02
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Master Harrison
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate