NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Mulkearns v Chandos Developments Pty Ltd (No 3) [2005] NSWSC 504
HEARING DATE(S) : 28/04/05
JUDGMENT DATE : 30 May 2005
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Young CJ in Eq
DECISION : Motion dismissed; costs costs in the cause.
CATCHWORDS : CONVEYANCING [75] & [96]- Breach of contract- Purchaser seeking recovery of deposit and instalments- Whether relevant that purchaser had history of defaulting on land contracts.
LEGISLATION CITED : Conveyancing Act 1919, s 55(2A)
AMEV-UDC Finance Ltd v Austin (1986) 162 CLR 170 Automatic Fire Sprinklers Pty Ltd v Watson (1946) 72 CLR 435 Berry v Mahony [1933] VLR 314 Clancy v Salienta Pty Ltd (2000) 11 BPR 20,425 Dewhirst v Edwards [1983] 1 NSWLR 34 Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd [1915] AC 79 Eighth SRJ Pty Ltd v Merity (1997) 7 BPR 15,189 CASES CITED : Lexane Pty Ltd v Highfern Pty Ltd [1985] 1 Qd R 446 Lucas & Tait (Investments) Pty Ltd v Victoria Securities Ltd [1973] 2 NSWLR 268 McDonald v Dennys Lascelles Ltd (1933) 48 CLR 457 Meyers v Casey (1913) 17 CLR 90 Mulkearns v Chandos Developments Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 1132 Nepean District Tennis Assosciation v Penrith City Council (1988) 4 BPR 9645; 66 LGRA 440 Pratt v Hawkins (1991) 32 NSWLR 319 Real Estate Securities Ltd v Kew Golf Links Estate Pty Ltd [1935] VLR 114
Anthony Michael Mulkearns and High Forest Estate Pty Ltd (P) PARTIES : Chandos Developments Pty Limited (D)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate