NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Estate of Frederick Cecil Lumb; McMillan & anor v Lumb & anor [2005] NSWSC 371
HEARING DATE(S) : 21 March 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 22 April 2005
Equity Division JURISDICTION : Probate List
JUDGMENT OF : Windeyer J at 1
DECISION : Document admitted to probate.
CATCHWORDS : SUCCESSION- probate - informal wills - testamentary intention - alterations made to existing draft before deceased entered hospital - document signed but not witnessed - deceased instructed daughter to retain the original document - referred to it as his will. - LEGISLATION - Wills Probate and Administration Act 1898 - s 18A.
LEGISLATION CITED : Wills Probate and Administration Act 1898 s18A
Diana Fay McMillan (First Plaintiff) William McMillan (Second Plaintiff) PARTIES : Christopher Edmund Lumb (First Defendant) Judith Ann Eslick (Second Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 109006 of 2004
Mr M S Willmott SC (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : Mr I D Roche (Defendants)
Owen Hodge Lawyers (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Hancock Alldis (Defendants)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION :
- 9 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION PROBATE LIST
WINDEYER J
FRIDAY 22 APRIL 2005
109006/04 THE ESTATE OF FREDERICK CECIL LUMB; MCMILLAN V LUMB & ESLICK JUDGMENT Issue 1 The question is whether a document dated 16 December 2002 which was signed by the deceased but not witnessed should be admitted to probate under s18A of the Wills Probate and Administration Act 1898. Legislation
Section 18A is as follows: 18A Certain documents to constitute wills etc (1) A document purporting to embody the testamentary intentions of a deceased person, even though it has not been executed in accordance with the formal requirements of this Act, constitutes a will of the deceased person, an amendment of such a will or the revocation of such a will if the Court is satisfied that the deceased person intended the document to constitute the person's will, an amendment of the person's will or the revocation of the person's will. (2) In forming its view, the Court may have regard (in addition to the document) to any other evidence relating to the manner of execution or testamentary intentions of the deceased person, including evidence (whether admissible before the commencement of this section or otherwise) of statements made by the deceased person.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate