NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 148 A Crim R 74
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Nicopoulos v Commissioner for Corrective Services [2004] NSWSC 562 HEARING DATE(S) : 21, 26, 27 & 28 May 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 29 June 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Smart AJ at 1 DECISION : See para 117
CATCHWORDS : Commissioner exercising power under cl 105 of Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Regulation to prevent solicitor entering gaols for legal visits for alleged breach of cl 97 and on intelligence information - non-disclosure of that information yet taken into account - eliding rules of procedural fairness to virtually nothing in circumstances - Commisioner's decision subject to judicial review - Operation of s 130 of Evidence Act 1995 - reputation and livelihood of solicitor at stake and interests of client inmate likely to be affected. Australian Law Reform Commission, Evidence, Vol 1 British Nationality Act 1981 Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Regulation 2001 LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 Evidence Act 1995 Prisons Act 1952 Summary Offences Act s 27E Supreme Court Act 1970 A-G v Ryan [1980] AC 718 Alister v The Queen (1983) 50 ALR 41 at 44-45 Amer v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs unrep 18 December 1989 Applicant Veal of 2002 v Minister for Immigration [2003] FCA 4 Ball v Minister for Immigration [2003] FCA 699 Bromley v Dawes (1983) 34 SASR 73 Doody v Secretary of State for the Home Dept [1994] 1 AC 531 at 560 Flynn v The King (1949) 79 CLR 1 Gilson v Minister for Immoigration 21 July 1997 Lehane J, BC9703148 Johns v Australian Securities Commission (1993) 178 CLR 408 at 472 CASES CITED : Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550 at 615 Leech v Deputy Governor of Parkhurst Prison [1988] AC 533 McEvoy v Lobban [1990] 2 Qd R 235 O'Reilly v Mackman [1983] 2 AC 237 at 279 Ousley v The Queen (1997) 192 CLR 69 at 79-80 Palmer v Kizon (1997) 72 FCR 409 R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Fayed & Anor [1997] 1 All ER 228 Russell v Duke of Norfolk [1949] 1 All ER 109 at 11 Smith v Commissioner of Corrective Services [1978] 1 NSWLR 317 at 328 The Queen v Forbes, ex parte Bevan (1972) 127 CLR 1 at 7 Vezitis v McGeechan [1974] 1 NSWLR 718 WAFG v Minister for Immigratin [2003] FCA 3 PARTIES : James Nicopoulos v Commissioner for Corrective Services FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 30036/04 COUNSEL : (P) C Steirn SC & F Santisi (D) N Perram & N Bilinski SOLICITORS : (P) Spanko Soulos & Co (D) I V Knight
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate