NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Infact Consulting Pty Ltd v Kyle House Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 1092
HEARING DATE(S) : 24/10/05
JUDGMENT DATE : 24 October 2005
Equity Division JURISDICTION : Corporations List
JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J
DECISION : Purported appeal dismissed as incompetent
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - winding up - statutory demand - appeal from decision of Associate Judge dismissing application for order setting aside demand - PROCEDURE - appeal - from Associate Judge - whether order dismissing application for order setting aside statutory demand is "final order" - whether correct avenue of appeal is to Court of Appeal or court constituted by a judge
Supreme Court Act 1970, ss.101(1)(a), 104 LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules 1970, Part 60 rule 17
A-Pak Plastics Pty Ltd v Merhone Pty Ltd (1995) 17 ACSR 176 CASES CITED : Buckland Products Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2003] VSCA 85 Meehan v Glazier Holdings Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 24
Infact Consulting Pty Limited - Appellant PARTIES : Kyle House Pty Limited - Respondent
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2836/05
Mr L.J. Karp - Appellant COUNSEL : Mr R.A. Parsons - Respondent
Cross Law - Appellant SOLICITORS : Norbert Lipton & Co
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court (Master)
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 2836/05
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Associate Justice Macready
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION CORPORATIONS LIST
BARRETT J
MONDAY 24 OCTOBER 2005
2836/05 INFACT CONSULTING PTY LTD v KYLE HOUSE PTY LTD
JUDGMENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate