NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : B I (Contracting) Pty Limited v Haylock [2005] NSWSC 592
HEARING DATE(S) : 20/6/05
JUDGMENT DATE : 22 June 2005
JUDGMENT OF : Bell J at 1
DECISION : 1. Pursuant to s 8 of the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (the Act) proceedings number 103 of 2005 pending in the Dust Diseases Tribunal of New South Wales (the DDT proceedings) brought by Melissa Haylock against Amaca Pty Limited, B I (Contracting) Pty Limited and St George Bank Limited be removed into the Common Law Division of this Court; 2. Pursuant to s 5(2)(b)(iii) of the Act the DDT proceedings be transferred to the Supreme Court of South Australia; 3. Dimiss the notice of motion filed on 10 June 2005.
Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989 Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 LEGISLATION CITED : Limitation of Actions Act 1936 (SA) Supreme Court Act 1970 Supreme Court Rules 1970
BHP Billiton Ltd v Schultz [2004] HCA 61; 79 ALJR 348 BHP Billiton Ltd v Utting [2005] NSWSC 260 Ewins v BHP Billiton Limited [2005] VSC 4 CASES CITED : ICI Australia Operations v WorkCover (NSW) [2004] NSWCA 55 James Hardie and Co Pty Ltd v Barry [2000] NSWCA 353; 50 NSWLR 357 John Pfeiffer Pty Ltd v Rogerson (2000) 203 CLR 503 Regit (No. 2) Pty Limited v Bendyk [2005] NSWSC 450
B I (Contracting) Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Melissa Haylock (1st Defendant) PARTIES : Amaca Pty Limited (2nd Defendant) St George Bank Limited (3rd Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20139/05
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate