NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 53 ACSR 610 (2005) 23 ACLC 746
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Alan Davis Group v Rivkin Financial Services [2005] NSWSC 369
HEARING DATE(S) : 14/04/05, 18/04/05
JUDGMENT DATE : 26 April 2005
JUDGMENT OF : Gzell J
DECISION : Plaintiff entitled to declaration that buy-back agreement validly terminated and to damages for breach of contract and/or under the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth), s 12GM. Not entitled to declarations and injunction with respect to voting right.
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - Transactions affecting share capital - Selective share buy-back agreements in consideration for other shares and cash negotiated by others in settlement disputes - Agreements conditional upon special or unanimous approval of shareholders - Plaintiff's agreement contained provision that directors agreed to recommend shareholder approval - Market value of other shares rose - Notice of general meeting contained statement that majority of directors recommended approval if other share price at specified amount - One director recommended against - Plaintiff purported to terminate - Whether termination valid - ASX listing rule 10.1 required approval of general meeting to disposal of a substantial asset under another selective share buy-back - Whether plaintiff an associate as acting in concert with party that negotiated settlement - Whether plaintiff excluded from voting under listing rule 14.11
Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) LEGISLATION CITED : Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
Transfield Pty Ltd v Arlo International Ltd (1980) 144 CLR 83 Hospital Products Ltd v United States Surgical Corporation (1984) 156 CLR 41 Scanlan's New Neon Ltd v Tooheys Ltd (1942-1943) 67 CLR 169 Global Network Services Pty Ltd v Legion Telecall Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 279 Tramways Advertising Pty Ltd v Luna Park (NSW) Ltd (1938) 38 SR (NSW) 632 Ankar Pty Ltd v National Westminster Finance (Australia) Ltd (1986-1987) 162 CLR 549 CASES CITED : Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co Ltd v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd [1962] 2 QB 26 Thorby v Goldberg (1964) 112 CLR 597 Oraka Pty Ltd v Leda Holdings Ltd (1997) ATPR 41-558 at 43717 Ford's Principles of Corporations Law, Butterworths, Australia, 2000 Industrial Equity Ltd v Commissioner for Corporate Affairs (1990) VR 780 IPT Systesm Ltd v MTIC Corporate Pty Ltd (2000) 158 FLR 349 at 355-356).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate