NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 63 NSWLR 719 157 A Crim R 515
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: R v Aiken [2005] NSWCCA 328
HEARING DATE(S): 12 July 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 20 September 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Studdert J at 1; Kirby J at 39; Howie J at 40
DECISION: Appeal in relation to the conviction for sexual intercourse without consent and in relation to the conviction for assault with act of indecency allowed; such convictions are quashed; in lieu thereof judgments of acquittal are entered.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal law - sexual intercourse without consent - intercourse subsequent to perceived threat to report complainant for shoplifting - whether such perceived non violent threat vitiated consent for offence charged against s 61I of the Crimes Act.
Crimes Act, ss 61D, 61I, 61L, 61R, 65A, 94 LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Appeal Act, s 6(1) Queensland Criminal Code, s 347
R v Jackson [2004] NSWCCA 110 Papadimitropoulos v The Queen (1956) 98 CLR 249 R. v Olugjoba (1982) QB 320 Question of Law (No. 1 of 1993) (1993) 59 SASR 214 R v O'Neill (1979) 2 NSSWLR 582 CASES CITED: R v Liberti (1991) 55 A Crim R 120 Reg v Dee 14 L.R.Ir 468 Reg v Clarence (1889) 22 QBD 23 Reg v Flattery (1876-77) 2 QBD 410 R v Williams (1923) 1 KB 340 R v Shaw (unreported, Qld CA, 21 December 1994)
PARTIES: Regina v Bruce Malcolm Aiken
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2005/899
J. Girdham (Crown) COUNSEL: C. Smith (Appellant)
S. Kavanagh (Crown) SOLICITORS: S.E. O'Connor (Appellant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate