NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : McAuliffe v Bell [2005] NSWSC 214
HEARING DATE(S) : 11 March 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 21 March 2005
JURISDICTION : Common Law Division
JUDGMENT OF : Master Harrison
DECISION : (1) Leave is granted under s 109 of the MAC Act for the plaintiff to commence proceedings; (2) The plaintiff's solicitors are to show cause why they should not pay the defendant's costs of the notice of motion.
CATCHWORDS : Extension of time to file ASC due to solicitor's failure - MAC Act 1999
Motor Accidents Act - s 52(3) LEGISLATION CITED : Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW) - ss 66(2) & 109 Supreme Court Rules - Part 20 r 4(5A)
Guest v Southern & Anor (NSWSC, unreported 22 September 1995) McAndrew v Wyoming Nursing Home (Sperling J, unreported, 5 December 1997) CASES CITED : Morton v Jools (1992) ATR 81-164 Russo v Aiello (2003) 201 ALR 231; [2003] HCA 53
Maddison Louise McAuliffe by her tutor Stephen Benjamin McAuliffe (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Shirley Anne Bell (Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20081/2003
Mr D W Elliott (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : Mr M Elkaim SC (Defendant)
G H Healey & Co - Sydney Sutherland (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Sparke Helmore (Defendant)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
MASTER HARRISON
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate