NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: R v Smith [2005] NSWCCA 236
HEARING DATE(S): 7 June 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 7 June 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Studdert J at 1; James J at 7; Howie J at 8
DECISION: Appeal allowed; the order made by her Honour in the Penrith District Court on 7 March 2005 is quashed; pursuant to s 12(2) of the Criminal Appeal Act the sentencing proceedings are returned to the District Court of New South Wales.
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act, ss 11, 12
CASES CITED: R v Palu (2002) 134 A Crim R 174
PARTIES: Regina v Wayne Daniel Smith
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2005/531
G. Rowling (Crown) COUNSEL: C. Craigie SC (Appellant)
S. Kavanagh (Crown) SOLICITORS: S.E. O'Connor (Appellant)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 05/21/1018
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: English DCJ
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2005/531
STUDDERT J JAMES J HOWIE J
Tuesday 7 June 2005 REGINA v WAYNE DANIEL SMITH Judgment 1 STUDDERT J: The respondent, Wayne Daniel Smith, pleaded guilty before her Honour Judge English to the offence of break and enter a building and commit a serious indictable offence. The respondent was convicted and the matter was adjourned pursuant to s 11 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act until 16 December 2005 on conditions that:
1. the applicant reside at the William Booth Institute at Surry Hills;
2. that he submit to random urinalysis as and when required;
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate