NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Orix Australia Corporation Limited v Moody Kiddell & Partners Pty Limited & Anor (No 2) [2006] NSWCA 301 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): On written submissions
JUDGMENT DATE: 7 November 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Spigelman CJ; Ipp JA; Basten JA
DECISION: (1) Respondents' application dismissed with costs. (2) There will be no variation to the costs order made when judgment delivered on 26 September 2006.
Calderbank v Calderbank (1975) 3 WLR 586 Herning v GWS Machinery Pty Ltd (No 2) [2005] NSWCA 375 CASES CITED: Leichhardt Municipal Council v Green [2004] NSWCA 341 Manly Council v Byrne (No 2) [2004] NSWCA 227 The Anderson Group Pty Ltd v Tynan Motors Pty Ltd (No 2) [2006] NSWCA 120
Orix Australia Corporation Limited (Appellant) PARTIES: Moody Kiddell & Partners Pty Limited (First Respondent) Christine Mathers (Second Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 41003/05
COUNSEL: T Hale SC/A Mitchelmore (Appellant) M McCulloch SC/J White (First and Second Respondents)
SOLICITORS: M D Nikolaidis & Co (Appellant) Ebsworth & Ebsworth (First and Second Respondents)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court - Equity Division
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): ED 6113/04
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: White J
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 30/11/05
LOWER COURT MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: [2005] NSWSC 1209
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 41003/05 ED 6113/04
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate