NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
King v Industrial Relations Commission of NSW [2005] NSWCA 314 CITATION: This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 08/09/05
JUDGMENT DATE: 8 September 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Young CJ in Eq at 1; Giles JA at 27-31, 33; Hunt AJA at 32
DECISION: Summons dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW- Privative clause- Whether court's jurisdiction ousted. INDUSTRIAL LAW- Franchise agreement- Unfair contracts- Applicant sought avoidance of agreement in Industrial Relations Commission- Unsuccessful- Application for certiorari, mandamus and prohibition- Contract held to be induced by misrepresentation at first instance- Commission in its discretion refused relief- No basis on which an appeal or prerogative orders could be granted, even if court had jurisdiction to grant them. (ND)
Commonwealth Constitution 1900, covering clause 5 Industrial Relations Act 1996, ss 106, 179 LEGISLATION CITED: Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 78B Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)
Finch v Copperart Pty Ltd (1995) 62 IR 162 I & L Securities Pty Ltd v HTW Valuers (Brisbane) Pty Ltd (2002) 210 CLR 109 CASES CITED: Kable v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (1996) 189 CLR 51 Mitchforce Pty Ltd v Industrial Relations Commission of NSW (2003) 57 NSWLR 212 Westfield Holdings v Adams (2001) 114 IR 241
Gregory John King (Claimant) Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales (1st Opponent) Cake It Away Pty Ltd (2nd Opponent) Cake It Away (Franchising) Pty Ltd (3rd Opponent) Paul Tartak (4th Opponent) PARTIES: Michael Tartak (5th Opponent) Tony Tartak (6th Opponent) Mary Tartak (7th Opponent) Pauline Tartak (8th Opponent) St George Bank Ltd (9th Opponent) Advance Leasing Ltd (10th Opponent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate