NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : J Aron Corporation v Newmont Yandal Operations [2004] NSWSC 996 HEARING DATE(S) : 25 October 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 25 October 2004 JURISDICTION: Equity JUDGMENT OF : Campbell J DECISION : Payment to recipient of subpoena ordered
CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE - subpoenas - subpoena duces tecum addressed to stranger to proceedings - entitlement of recipient of subpoena to payment for its expense and loss - manner of calculation of amount to be paid LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules 1970 Deposit & Investment Co Ltd (Receivers Appointed) v Peat Marwick Mitchell & Co (1996) 39 NSWLR 267 Danieletto v Khera (1995) 35 NSWLR 684 CASES CITED : Fuelxpress Ltd v L M Ericsson Pty Ltd (1987) 75 ALR 284 Foyster v Foyster Holdings [2003] NSWSC 881 Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 77 Re Pan Pharmaceuticals Ltd; Selim v McGrath [2004] NSWSC 129 J Aron Corporation - First Plaintiff/Respondent AMC Consultants Pty Limited - Non-party Applicant Goldman Sachs Group Inc - Second Plaintiff Newmont Yandal Operations Pty Ltd (Administration Appointed) - First Defendant Mark Anthony Korda in his capacity as Administrator of Newmont Yandal Operations Pty Ltd - Second Defendant Mark Francis Xavier Mentha in his capacity as Administrator of Newmont Yandal Operations Pty Ltd - Third Defendant Clynton Court Pty Ltd (subject to a Deed of Company Arrangement) - Fourth Defendant Australian Metals Corporations Pty Ltd - Fifth Defendant Eagle Mining Pty Ltd - Sixth Defendant PARTIES : Great Central Holdings Pty Ltd - Seventh Defendant Great Central Investments Pty Ltd - Eighth Defendant Great Central Mines Pty Ltd - Ninth Defendant Hunter Resources Pty Ltd - Tenth Defendant Matlock Castellano Pty Ltd - Eleventh Defendant Matlock Mining Pty Ltd - Twelfth Defendant Newmont Wiluna Gold Pty Ltd - Thirteenth Defendant Newmont Wiluna Metals Pty Ltd - Fourteenth Defendant Newmont Wiluna Mines Pty Ltd - Fifteenth Defendant Quotidian No 117 Pty Ltd - Sixteenth Defendant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4666/03 COUNSEL : M Ryckmans, solicitor - Plaintiff/Respondent I Griscti - Applicant SOLICITORS : Abbott Tout - Plaintiff/Respondent Allens Arthur Robinson - Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate