NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Owners of Strata Plan 58577 v Banmor Developments Finance Pty Limited and Others [2006] NSWCA 325
HEARING DATE(S): 17 August 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 23 November 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Beazley JA at 1; Santow JA at 19; Basten JA at 20
DECISION: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal allowed. (See orders at [18])
CATCHWORDS: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Discretion exercised in first instance to disallow further expert report under Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) – re-exercise of discretion where first expert disclaims competence, in particular specialised area – Allowance of further report on basis of justice to parties to the dispute despite tension with need for expeditious resolution of disputes.
LEGISLATION CITED: Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW): Pt 39 r1, r6, Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 31.33
CASES CITED: Jackamarra v Krakouer (1998) 195 CLR 516 State of Queensland v J L Holdings Pty Ltd (1997) 189 CLR 146
OWNERS OF STRATA PLAN 58577 (Appellant) PARTIES: BANMOR DEVELOPMENTS FINANCE PTY LIMITED (ACN 094 969 141) (First Respondent) PLUIM CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LIMITED (ACN 001 029 198) (Second Respondent) RYDE CITY COUNCIL (Third Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40301/06
G SEGAL (Appellant) COUNSEL: J M IRELAND, QC (First and Third Respondents) G W McGRATH (Second Respondent)
Charles G Roth (Appellant) SOLICITORS: Toltz La Hood Lawyers (First Respondent) Tesoriero Henderson Cotter (Second Respondent) Pike Pike & Fenwick (Third Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate