NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Bernasconi v Newcastle City Council [2005] NSWCA 422
HEARING DATE(S): 21 November 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 5 December 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Giles JA at 1; McColl JA at 2; Brownie AJA at 36
DECISION: Leave to appeal refused with costs
CATCHWORDS: APPEAL – leave to appeal – NEGLIGENCE - Pedestrian injured when she tripped and fell on an uneven section of footpath in shopping mall – whether primary judge placed excessive emphasis on the issue of obviousness of risk in finding Council had not breached its duty of care – relevance of earlier falls in the mall – leave to appeal refused (ND)
LEGISLATION CITED: n/a
Brodie v Singleton Shire Council; Ghantous v Hawkesbury Shire Council [2001] HCA 29; (2001) 206 CLR 512 Consolidated Broken Hill Ltd v Edwards [2005] NSWCA 380 Mulligan v Coffs Harbour City Council [2005] HCA 63 Richmond Valley Council v Standing [2002] NSWCA 359; (2002) 127 LGERA 237 CASES CITED: Sutherland Shire Council v Pallister [2002] NSWCA 66 Suttor v Gundowda Pty Ltd [1950] HCA 35; (1950) 81 CLR 418 Turnbull v Alm [2004] NSWCA 173 Vairy v Wyong Shire Council [2005] HCA 62 Water Board v Moustakas [1988] HCA 12; (1988) 180 CLR 491
Jean Marie Bernasconi (Claimant) PARTIES: Newcastle City Council (Opponent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40081/05
P C B Semmler QC/A C Canceri (Claimant) COUNSEL: M T McCulloch SC/G J Hickey (Opponent)
CMC Lawyers (Claimant) SOLICITORS: Phillips Fox Lawyers (Opponent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate