NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Gordian Runoff v Price & Ors [2004] NSWSC 600 HEARING DATE(S) : 1 July 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 1 July 2004
JUDGMENT OF : McDougall J at 1 DECISION : See para [16] of judgment
CATCHWORDS : EVIDENCE - legal professional privilege - where plaintiff seeks to restrain first defendant from providing legal services to second defendant - where second defendant asserts that plaintiff gave consent to first defendant to do so - where second defendant relies on laches, acquiescence, waiver or estoppel - where second defendant claims privilege in evidence of conversations from which consent may be inferred and on which claims of laches, acquiescence, waiver or estoppel are based - loss of privilege - whether privilege lost - s 122 Evidence Act - whether implied consent -inconsistency - whether inconsistent for second defendant to assert that first defendant obtained consent of plaintiff to act for second defendant and maintain privilege in discussions said to prove consent - whether inconsistency where second defendant relies on relevant facts to support claims of laches, acquiescence, waiver or estoppel LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Singapore Airlines v Sydney Airports Corporation [2004] NSWSC 380 Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd v Spalvins (1998) 81 FCR 360 Telstra Corporation Ltd v BT Australasia Pty Ltd (1998) 85 FCR 152 Garratt's Limited v Thanga Thangathurai [2002] NSWSC 39 CASES CITED : Fort Dodge Australia Pty Limited v Nature Vet Pty Limited [2002] FCA 501 DSE (Holdings) Pty Ltd v Intertan Inc (2003) 127 FCR 499 Re Doran Constructions Pty Ltd (in liq) (2002) 194 ALR 101 United Rural Enterprises v Lopmand [2002] NSWSC 1142 Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1 Gordian Runoff Limited (formerly GIO Insurance Limited) (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Timothy Randolph Price and the persons referred to in Schedule "A" trading as Phillips Fox (First Defendant) Baulderstone Hornibrook Engineering Pty Limited (Second Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50072/04 R M Smith/M A Jones (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : P R Garling SC/I Pike (First Defendant) A J McInerney (Second Defendant) I Denham (Solicitor) (for TGI) Corrs Chambers Westgarth (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Phillips Fox (First Defendant) Freehills (Second Defendant) Moray & Agnew (TGI)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate