NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Regina v Pham [2005] NSWCCA 9
HEARING DATE(S): 22 November 2004
JUDGMENT DATE: 4 February 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Sully J at 1; Dunford J at 177; Hidden J at 178
DECISION: Extension of time granted ; Appeal against conviction dismissed; Leave granted to appeal against sentence; Appeal against senenced allowed and sentence passed at first instance quashed; In lieu appellant re-sentenced to imprisonment for 20 years commencing on 5 October 2000 and expiring on 4 October 2020, with a non-parole period of 16 years commencing 5 October 2000 and expiring on 4 October 2016, on which latter date the appellant will first become eligible for parole.
LEGISLATION CITED: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)
Maxwell v The Queen (1996) 184 CLR 501 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 MFA v The Queen [2002] 213 CLR 606 R v Linh Le [2000] NSWCCA 49 Reg v Tangye (1997) 92 A Crim R 545 Reg v Taylor [2003] NSW CCA 194 CASES CITED: Reg v Tran [1999] NSWCCA 109 Reg v AEM Snr. NSWCCA 58 Reg v Townsend and Cooper (unreported: NSWCCA, 14 February 1995) Roser and ors : Sentencing Law NSW Vol 1 Reg v Toki [2003] NSWCCA 125 Irani [2002] NSWCCA 153
Regina PARTIES: Bao Gnoc PHAM
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2004/1854
P. Ingram - Crown COUNSEL: M. Ramage QC - Appellant
S. Kavanagh - Crown SOLICITORS: Theo Voros - Appellant
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 70078/01
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate