NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Rolfe v Katunga Lucerne Mill Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 252
HEARING DATE(S): 13 May 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 28 July 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Hodgson JA at 1; Santow JA at 2; McClellan AJA at 126
DECISION: (1) Judgment and orders in the court below in favour of the respondents/defendants to be set aside. ; (2) In lieu thereof judgment for the appellant/plaintiff against the second respondent/defendant on the issue of liability, damages to be assessed. ; (3) Matter to be remitted to the District Court of New South Wales for: ; (a) a new trial on the issue of damages; ; (b) a determination of the cross-claim brought by the cross-claimant, Robank Farm Supplies Pty Limited, against the cross-defendant, Katunga Lucerne Mill Pty Limited. ; (4) The respondents/defendants to pay 80% of the appellant's costs of the appeal and of the trial in the court below.
CATCHWORDS: PRODUCT LIABILITY - Sale of Goods - Merchantable quality - causation - no novus actus interveniens when plaintiff's horses poisoned by contaminated chaff from supplier in circumstances where plaintiff aware of rumours of possibility of contaminated product but not notified - Whether proper inference drawn from facts - Admissibility of evidence.
LEGISLATION CITED: Sale of Goods Act 1923 (NSW) ss19(1) and (2)
Alexander v Cambridge Credit Corporation Ltd (1987) 9 NSWLR 310 Annikin v Sierra (2004) 79 ALJR 452 Mahoney v J Kruschich (Demolitions) Pty Ltd (1985) 156 CLR 522 March v E & M H Stramare Pty Ltd (1991) 171 CLR 506 CASES CITED: Hadley v Baxendale [1854] 9 Ex 341 at 354; 156 ER 145 Lexmead (Basingstoke) Ltd v Lewis (1982) AC 225 State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Earthline Constructions Pty Ltd (in liq) (1999) 73 ALJR 306 Warren v Coombes (1979) 142 CLR 531
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate