NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Regina v BB [2005] NSWCCA 215
HEARING DATE(S): 09/06/2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 16 June 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Studdert J at 1; James J at 2; Howie J at 3
DECISION: Application for leave to appeal is granted but the appeal is dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal Law - Sentencing - Taking into account a matter being an element of an aggravated form of the principal offence - delay - whether sentence manifestly excessive.
Crimes Act 1900 - ss 35(b), 112(2), 112(3) LEGISLATION CITED: Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 - ss 3, 28 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 - s 32
R v De Simoni (1981) 147 CLR 383 Attorney-General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 199 (2002) 56 NSWLR 146 R v Dowd [2005] NSWCCA 113 CASES CITED: R v Bavadra (2000) 115 A Crim R 152 R v Barton (2001) A Crim R 185 R v Todd [1982] 2 NSWLR 517 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25
PARTIES: Regina v BB
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2005/808
D. Frearson SC - Crown COUNSEL: C. Craigie SC - Applicant
S. Kavanagh - Crown SOLICITORS: S. O'Connor - Applicant
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 04/11/0483
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Latham DCJ
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2005/808 CCAP
STUDDERT J JAMES J HOWIE J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate